Tip 7 - Avoid ambiguous words and phrases.
The Internet  has provided me with a perfect, recent anecdote on the importance of  clear and precise legal writing. On Monday, March 6th, legal blogs were  buzzing over the decision by a Texas bankruptcy judge to deny a motion  on the grounds of 'incomprehensibility'. In fact, the judge was so  angered by the poor legal drafting that he added a footnote to the  decision quoting a scene from the 1995 comedy 'Billy Madison', which  included these lines: 
'At no point in your rambling,  incoherent response was there anything that could even be considered a  rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having  listened to it.' 
The footnote concluded: 
'Deciphering  motions like the one presented here wastes valuable chamber staff time,  and invites this sort of footnote.' 
The motion also invites  this Tip 7 and underscores why ambiguous words and phrases should be  avoided. While I don't see the Court of First Instance (CFI) or European  Court of Justice (ECJ) quoting Hollywood in their next judgments, I do  see how lack of clarity can frustrate the purpose of your writing,  whether it be to persuade a reader to your side or explain a key point  of law. If a reader could possibly interpret your text in more than one  way, it may just be a way adverse to your intended meaning. Ambiguity  can arise in a number of instances, including the following: 
1.  words or phrases may have several different meanings
2. particular  placement of words in a sentence lends itself to different  interpretations
3. pronouns may refer to more than one person or  object in a sentence
4. abbreviations or acronyms may not be known to  the reader 
Of course, other causes of ambiguity may be found in  the substance of your writing, but this article focuses on how to  correct the four language problems listed above. 
1. Words or  Phrases May Have Several Different Meanings 
Many English  words have more than one meaning, such as duck (noun: the swimming bird,  or verb: a quick lowering of the head or body) or a word may represent a  group of things, such as vehicle, which can include automobiles, army  tanks, motorcycles, or even lawn mowers. The best way to avoid different  interpretations of your writing is to replace the ambiguous words with  concrete language. For example, if a local district wants to ban heavy  trucks from their highways, the legislation would be clearer if it  specifically contained the words 'trucks over [x] tonnage' rather than  'large vehicles'. 
Moreover, in legal writing, a more technical  meaning may attach to an ordinary word. A common example is the word  residence. Say you advise clients that jurisdiction will be determined  by their place of residence. Well, does that mean the place where they  are currently living or the place deemed to be their permanent home  under the law? 
To clear up this confusion, you can add a  qualifying phrase or include a definition of the term. For example,  Jurisdiction will be determined by your place of residence can be  clarified in a number of ways: 
- Jurisdiction will be determined  by the place you are living at the present time.
- Jurisdiction will  be determined by your place of residence, which means your current  legal domicile. 
- Jurisdiction will be determined by your place of  residence. Under Belgian law, residence is defined under Statute X. 
2.  Particular Placement of Words in a Sentence Lends Itself to Different  Interpretations 
The way words or phrases are arranged in a  sentence may also create ambiguity. Take, for example, this sentence: 
The  lawyer went off to court to fight with her legal team. 
Is  the lawyer having an argument with her fellow lawyers or is she going to  court to fight accompanied by her legal team? Or this sentence: 
The  property owner agreed to fill the ditch in front of the building with  his tenants. 
If this means that the owner is filling a hole with  the bodies of his tenants, rather than coming to an agreement with  them, then we may just have a crime on our hands! 
To solve this  problem, place the modifying word or phrase as close to the word it  modifies. This means that the above sentences will now read like this: 
The  lawyer went off to court with her legal team to fight.
The  property owner agreed with his tenants to fill the ditch in  front of the building. 
3. Pronouns May Refer to More Than One  Person or Object in a Sentence 
Ambiguous pronouns are  another element that can affect the clarity of your writing. The  ambiguity occurs when the pronoun can refer to more than one person or  object. For example: 
After the most senior partner hires the  new office manager, she or he will then hire the new secretaries. 
Who  is hiring the secretaries - the partner or office manager? Repeating  the noun or restructuring the sentence should clarify the sentence.  Thus, the example can be changed to: 
After the most senior  partner hires the new office manager, the manager will then hire the new  secretaries. 
Alternatively: 
The most senior  partner hires the new office manager. The job of hiring the new  secretaries then becomes the responsibility of the new manager. 
4.  Abbreviations or Acronyms May Not Be Known to the Reader 
Finally,  watch out for abbreviations and acronyms that may be unfamiliar to the  reader. While CFI and ECJ may be common acronyms in  Brussels, they may be less familiar to, say, American lawyers. Simply  spell out the particular reference at the beginning of your document,  followed by its abbreviation in quotations or in parenthesis, and then  you're free to use the acronym throughout the rest of your text.
Previous Tip - Transition between paragraphs.
Next Tip - Avoid nominalizations.